Topic: Use Bootstrap AND/OR MDB?
Hi, To use this, should I cite the CSS URL for BOTH Bootstrap and Material Design for Bootstrap, or JUST the latter? Until now, I have used both...
<!-- Bootstrap 4 --> <link rel="stylesheet" href="https://maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com/bootstrap/4.0.0-alpha.2/css/bootstrap.min.css" integrity="sha384-y3tfxAZXuh4HwSYylfB+J125MxIs6mR5FOHamPBG064zB+AFeWH94NdvaCBm8qnd" crossorigin="anonymous"> <link rel="stylesheet" href="https://maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com/font-awesome/4.5.0/css/font-awesome.min.css">
... Which appeared perfect. If I switch off Bootstrap, my tables go wonky. (Maybe it's my own markup, everything else stays okay).
<!-- Material Design for Bootstrap --> <link rel="stylesheet" href="https://cdn.rawgit.com/FezVrasta/bootstrap-material-design/dist/dist/bootstrap-material-design.min.css">
Following up... I'm aware I am currently using MDB in the incorrect manner. ie. As above, I am inserting <link> for the remote, CDN versions of Bootstrap 4 and MDB. This results in a different look. The navbar text is in capitals, the nav links don't have coloured shades behind, the body links are in a dark green/jade. However, I kind of prefer the way it looks. My question is: what's going on here? Is this a valid way to use MDB?
Hi, Robert! Check our 5 min Quick Start
Hire our experts to build a dedicated project. We'll analyze your business requirements, for free.
Specification of the issue
- User: Free
- Premium support: No
- Technology: General Bootstrap questions
- MDB Version: -
- Device: -
- Browser: -
- OS: -
- Provided sample code: No
- Provided link: No